Showing posts with label Rod Scribner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rod Scribner. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Tick Tock Tuckered Daffy Shoots Moon

 

Been very icky for the past few weeks. Personally I don't feel comfortable talking about my regular ol' self, but I'm getting sick and tired of almost everything in general. But that doesn't stop me from watching stuff from the 1920s-50s.


Here's a very cuddly and soft escape from the past from Warner Bros., it's Tick Tock Tuckered (1944) starring Porky Pig & Daffy Duck, except it isn't brought that way and has this utterly cool and savage scene of Daffy getting fed up by the full moon, shoots it and something creatively unexpected happens. 




Of course this amazing scene was animated by the one and only Rod Scribner. One of my favorite animators. This was Daffy at his cutest, but also most threatening as Scribner is known for animating characters with that angry facial expression.





The animation here is rubbery but it works well with the overall gag they're going for in this particular scene.





Right after he shoots Moon, it suddenly drops like a big drip of rain. Daffy is immediately in shock.




We get ourselves some wacky drawings.  
























This drawing stays on screen the longest. I find these scenes to be wonderful since it feels so different than "limited" animation where the characters don't move impulsively.










Daffy then breaks the 4th wall by saying "Unbelievable, isn't it?" 


This is a remake of Porky's Badtime Story (1937). Still directed by Bob Clampett, there was different gags in that cartoon, and instead of Daffy Duck, it was Gabby Goat.


In the original, the certain scene with the moon disturbing Porky's sleep is by tying the window curtain to his bed, causing a wreck and an accident.  




Here's the full scene in action.



 

Credits to Sakugabooru as I found the clip from there, only slightly trimmed.

Monday, November 24, 2025

My Story-Telling Perspective

 

Previously, I was talking about characters and specific designs I enjoy handling and studying the most. I want to talk about my love for the stories and emotions from my favorite films. 


In my opinion, animation seems to have more original and conceptual ideas to their films, since you could do anything with it. It's your imagination. The Tex Avery cartoons were well-known for their vivid motion and sharp slapstick and gags, and while I still love those cartoons to this day, they didn't have a deep and motivational premise, it was all for comedy and jokes.


I felt like I could understand more mature and appealing concepts when watching non-animation films, it was difficult to manage but I could finally see why they were impactful and iconic. I didn't like Casablanca at first, but re-visiting a few moments and knowing a more relatable and serious story makes it more intriguing and heartwarming. 




My favorite films of all time are mostly focusing on a structured plot and deep emotion. A few mentions are The Great Piggy Bank Robbery, Heavenly Puss, and Pluto's Judgement Day. 


Pluto's Judgement Day has a ton of eerie and haunting imagery. Usually the Mickey Mouse characters tend to be tame, but in scenarios like this I can live for. I could imagine these characters actually feeling frightened in these horrifying situations, and for it's mild runtime it actually works. 





I'm not only influenced by stories from animation obviously, which is why I tend to collect books. Little Golden Books. If you were going to tell my all-time favorite story it would be Matilda. I loved the Roald Dahl stuff when I was younger, not all of it but I do like James and The Giant Peach as well, but Matilda in particular interested me more than any other story, the movie is one of my all-time favorites as well. 


Same with Bambi, instead I haven't read the original story at all, but there's an undeniably dark and sometimes cruel element to the movie. It focuses on a good protagonist followed by real-life situations. Animal vs Man, and it is that character to be challenged and take responsibilities. 




Something like Fantasia, and An Optical Poem has a great abstract sense to it, but it barely shows depth and structure, they have great animation but that's it. Take more character-oriented films like The Secret of NIMH, Pinocchio, and The Goddess of Spring and add those elements but not for too long, that way we can focus on the character's actions as well, they don't need alot of dialogue or zany energy they can just connect to the environment. 





Sometimes a movie can take on another level of story-telling, take It's A Wonderful Life, the ultimate movie.




What makes this movie incredible in particular is how extremely real it handles life as a whole, you don't know what could happen, yet you have to be careful, and be prepared and honest whatever the situation may be. That's what I love about George Bailey. The scene with the guardian angel was just tear-jearking and so beautiful. The acting was just impeccable, as well as the message.







I could kinda see animation having human emotion and deep understanding like those movies. It just doesn't happen in short films it's more in movies and that's kind of a shocker. 

Animators like Rod Scribner, I truly love not because it's funny drawings, but those drawings actually show off human acting and alot more distinctive expression, and with short films like The Great Piggy Bank Robbery I could live with. It's mostly chaotic but it's well-thought out, there's a ton of imagination and unexpected possibilities, and the color schemes were unique. 



I love looking into different variants of illustrated art. I love alot of vintage paintings and magazines. My favorites are the two-tone colorized illustrations and paintings by Edward Hopper, Maxfield Parrish, Claude Monet and Albert Bierstadt. 




I could just imagine an animated film with this sorta style and having traditional 2D animation, with a serious but interesting story and I would've loved it. 





I felt like story-telling being simple and novel was the best. I don't really enjoy movie franchises, or TV shows as much as other people, I tend to like a short journey onto the next, it's more fun that way in my opinion. Some exceptions are The Backyardigans, my favorite episodes were some of my younger childhood experiences like International Super Spy, A Giant Problem but also liked episodes recently like Who Goes There, Fly Girl, and Escape From Fairytale Village, even with title names like that, you would be invested in them.





Now I definitely know that people have different interests and they prefer more complex stories, and that is totally fine, like what you like, I don't force people to enjoy what's best for me. 

I do think what I'm interested in feels unique and interesting in my tastes. I find myself liking these dark, sometimes cynical but positive outlooks of life. 




When creating something myself, I don't revert to past experiments, I tend to love the old stuff, but since quality has evolved over the years, I want to use those inspirations for a modern approach. 

The older Disney movies for example. 1937 to about 1953, had some excellent and wholesome energy to them, but they weren't always flawless. I do tend to count some moments I didn't specifically like in those movies like the War-Time era movies mostly being package shorts, the songs can sometimes come off as silly, or one long overdue scene, but those happen rarely and I'm happy for that.

If you want to know what Disney era was best, it was the Dark Age. Yeah, no kidding. 

The Many Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh, The Great Mouse Detective, The Rescuers, Robin Hood, heck even The Black Cauldron, an extreme guilty pleasure of mine are all classics, and guess what? (gasp) No sign of Disney princesses! No silly prince! The one unexceptional film from that era was The Aristocats, but even then that's ok. What I loved about those movies was that the story-telling and characters were at their absolute finest, they had more darker imagery, and interesting villains. 



Anyways, I feel like I'm fine with what I've talked about today. If you want to check out my previous post of focusing on cartoon characters, feel free to check that out. 


Sunday, September 21, 2025

Bacall To Arms (1946) Cartoon Insanity

 

The title of the post is not a joke. Cartoon Insanity will be a series of posts throughout the upcoming future. 


There's this cartoon I've been thinking about for months. The animation is so rubbery and vivid that I need to talk about it.


It's called Bacall to Arms (1946) it's a Looney Tunes short planned by Bob Clampett, but was finished by Art Davis. As you can tell by what might be happening well...




Right away we get our first reference to Metro Goldwyn Mayer, one of the kings of Golden Age animation. What is this?! The lion is screeching while I guess his baby cub is biting onto his tail. What is he doing with his foot? This is definitely something Clampett or either Art Davis would approve.


 

Various other gags appear before the feature film starts in the movie theater. After that is some stellar frame shots of actress Lauren Bacall and Humphrey Bogart.

This was an attempt to reenact To Have and Have Not (1944).





I like the colors scheme in these scenes. It's not the usual typical clean black and white colors we get in the actual real movies.





The best moments are The Wolf's reactions. He's in similar vain to the wolf in Red Hot Riding Hood (1943) directed by Tex Avery. I'm highly sure that Clampett and possibly Davis loved Avery's MGM cartoons. 







Incredible drawings!


 



I would've loved to see a fully length short film of these two characters, maybe even just the art style, that would've been cool and inspiring. 


There's this walk cycle I admire of Bacall with her cigar and there's flames in her heels.






We get to see more funny and janky movements of the wolf's reactions. I'm definitely thinking Rod Scribner did alot of these scenes.





















When The Wolf acts more enthusiastic, there's these simple linear gradient backgrounds. 


 



And also a ton of smears.








While I love the comedic energy, the designs and the more toned-down scenes of the live action style characters, the rest of it is not as great or thrilling as I hoped it would be. This may be just a standard cartoon with not much cohesion but it's still got some funny moments, despite the re-used animation from another Looney Tunes short almost a decade prior.






Seriously it feels like the movie theater is packed with 1930s style characters and 1940s characters at the same time.



A Christmas Post In April

  Ever just found something very interesting and cool at a store and you just want to post it even if it's something related to the holi...